The Effect of Adding Barley and Oats Husks Ashes on the Properties of Ordinary Portland cement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58916/jhas.v8i5.73الكلمات المفتاحية:
Barley Husk Ash; Oats Husk Ash; Ordinary Portland Cement; standard water of consistency; waste materialsالملخص
In this scientific study, the researcher’s analysed agricultural waste materials, namely barley husk ash (BHA) and oats husk ash (OHA), as possible substitutes for ordinary Portland cement (OPC). The primary aim was to improve OPC production capacity while mitigating ecological and economic problems linked with traditional OPC production. A range of cement blends, comprising different proportions (0, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 wt. %) of BHA or OHA additives in OPC, were prepared and analysed.
Raw material analysis was conducted through X-ray fluorescence technique (XRF), complying with established standards. Cement mixes, resulting from the blends, were scrutinised for their cementing properties and mechanical performance according to international standards. The properties analysed were standard water of consistency (WOC), bulk density, apparent porosity and compressive strength after a hydration period of 28 days. A 15% ash inclusion resulted in the maximum compressive strength of hardened cement pastes, specifically, a 42% increase for reinforcing with BHA (strength value rose from 358 to 510 Kg/cm3) and a 38% increase in strength value for OHA incorporation (strength value increased from 340 to 470 Kg/cm3).
The study's findings showed that the incorporation of 15-20 wt. % of BHA or OHA led to a substantial improvement in the cementing properties examined. It is noteworthy that BHA was found to be more advantageous as cement mixes containing BHA demonstrated superior cementing properties in comparison to the other investigated samples. The superior performance of the cement blends can be attributed to the relatively higher pozzolanic nature demonstrated by BHA, which had a positive impact overall.
التنزيلات
المراجع
Reference:
M. Bustillo Revuelta, M. Bustillo Revuelta, Cement, Constr. Mater. Geol. Prod. Appl. (2021) 117–165.
E. Adeyanju, C.A. Okeke, Exposure effect to cement dust pollution: A mini review, SN Appl. Sci. 1 (2019) 1572.
D.M. Martinez, A. Horvath, P.J.M. Monteiro, Comparative environmental assessment of limestone calcined clay cements and typical blended cements, Environ. Res. Commun. 5 (2023) 55002.
S.A. Miller, G. Habert, R.J. Myers, J.T. Harvey, Achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions in the cement industry via value chain mitigation strategies, One Earth. 4 (2021) 1398–1411.
A. Bahhou, Y. Taha, Y. El Khessaimi, R. Hakkou, A. Tagnit-Hamou, M. Benzaazoua, Using calcined marls as non-common supplementary cementitious materials—a critical review, Minerals. 11 (2021) 517.
Q. Wang, J. Long, L. Xu, Z. Zhang, Y. Lv, Z. Yang, K. Wu, Experimental and modelling study on the deterioration of stabilized soft soil subjected to sulfate attack, Constr. Build. Mater. 346 (2022) 128436.
J.A. Abdalla, B.S. Thomas, R.A. Hawileh, J. Yang, B.B. Jindal, E. Ariyachandra, Influence of nano-TiO2, nano-Fe2O3, nanoclay and nano-CaCO3 on the properties of cement/geopolymer concrete, Clean. Mater. 4 (2022) 100061.
V. Rahhal, R. Talero, Early hydration of Portland cement with crystalline mineral additions, Cem. Concr. Res. 35 (2005) 1285–1291.
Y. Villagrán-Zaccardi, N. Alderete, C. Pico-Cortés, C. Zega, P. Risdanareni, N. De Belie, Effect of wastes as supplementary cementitious materials on the transport properties of concrete, Waste Byprod. Cem. Mater. (2021) 191–227.
M. Sámano Chong, A. Muciño Vélez, I. Rosales Chávez, L.F. Guerrero Baca, Practical Test for Pozzolanic Properties by AD Cowper: Implementation and Innovation, in: Hist. Mortars Int. Conf., Springer, 2022: pp. 523–541.
M. Ouedraogo, M. Sawadogo, I. Sanou, M. Barro, S. Nassio, M. Seynou, L. Zerbo, Characterization of sugar cane bagasse ash from Burkina Faso for cleaner cement production: Influence of calcination temperature and duration, Results Mater. 14 (2022) 100275.
R. Snellings, G. Mertens, J. Elsen, Supplementary cementitious materials, Rev. Mineral. Geochemistry. 74 (2012) 211–278.
R. Pode, Potential applications of rice husk ash waste from rice husk biomass power plant, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 53 (2016) 1468–1485.
G. Thomas, K. Rangaswamy, Strengthening of cement blended soft clay with nano-silica particles, Geomech. Eng. 20 (2020) 505–516.
A. Hidalgo Lopez, J.L. García Calvo, J. García Olmo, S. Petit, M.C. Alonso, Microstructural evolution of calcium aluminate cements hydration with silica fume and fly ash additions by scanning electron microscopy, and mid and near‐infrared spectroscopy, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91 (2008) 1258–1265.
K.M.T. Aquino, Incorporating Rice Husk Ash (RHA) as partial replacement for ordinary Portland cement in Loadbearing Concrete Hollow Blocks (CHB), (2021).
E. Gartner, H. Hirao, A review of alternative approaches to the reduction of CO2 emissions associated with the manufacture of the binder phase in concrete, Cem. Concr. Res. 78 (2015) 126–142.
R.H. Boukarroum, Sol-Gel synthesis of silica nanoparticles and their role in predicting cement mortar strength at early ages, (2020).
S.M. Awadh, M.R.A. Al-Owaidi, Designing Raw Mix for Manufacturing Portland Cement using Euphrates Formation Marl Instead of Clays, Iraqi Geol. J. (2021) 87–97.
S.P. Dunuweera, R.M.G. Rajapakse, Cement types, composition, uses and advantages of nanocement, environmental impact on cement production, and possible solutions, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018 (2018) 1–11.
A. Bosoaga, O. Masek, J.E. Oakey, CO2 capture technologies for cement industry, Energy Procedia. 1 (2009) 133–140.
V.M. Malhotra, Role of Supplementary Cementing Materials and Superplasticisers in Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions. ICFRC, (2004).
V. Sibanda, S. Ndlovu, G. Dombo, A. Shemi, M. Rampou, Towards the utilization of fly ash as a feedstock for smelter grade alumina production: a review of the developments, J. Sustain. Metall. 2 (2016) 167–184.
M. Sayehi, H. Tounsi, G. Garbarino, P. Riani, G. Busca, Reutilization of silicon-and aluminum-containing wastes in the perspective of the preparation of SiO2-Al2O3 based porous materials for adsorbents and catalysts, Waste Manag. 103 (2020) 146–158.
A.A.H. Saeed, N.Y. Harun, M.M. Nasef, Physicochemical characterization of different agricultural residues in malaysia for bio char production, Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 10 (2019) 213–225.
L.A. Zemnukhova, A.E. Panasenko, E.A. Tsoi, G.A. Fedorishcheva, N.P. Shapkin, A.P. Artem’Yanov, V.Y. Maiorov, Composition and structure of amorphous silica produced from rice husk and straw, Inorg. Mater. 50 (2014) 75–81.
Chaocan Zheng, et al.Compressive Strength and Microstructure of Activated Carbon-fly Ash Cement Composites, Chemical Engineering Transactions. 59 ( 2017) 475-480
Alaa M. Rashad. A brief on high-volume Class F fly ash as cement replacement – A
guide for Civil Engineer, International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment. 4 (2015) 278-306.
S. Chowdhury, M. Mishra & O. Suganya, The incorporation of wood waste ash as a partial cement replacement material for making structural grade concrete: An overview, Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 6 (2015) 429-437.
Erdogdu K. and Turker P. Effects of fly ash particle size on strength of portland cement fly ash mortars, Cem. Concr. Res. 28 (1998),)1217-1222.
J. d’Ans, H. Eick, The system CaO–Al2O3–H2O at 20 C and the hardening of aluminous cements, ZKG. 6 (1953) 197–210.
M. Ian, M. David, Towards a sustainable cement industry, Climate change, sub-study 8, World Bus. Counc. Sustain. Dev. (2002).
E. Marchetti, Use of agricultural wastes as supplementary cementitious materials, (2020).
P. Chindaprasirt, S. Rukzon, Strength, porosity and corrosion resistance of ternary blend Portland cement, rice husk ash and fly ash mortar, Constr. Build. Mater. 22 (2008) 1601–1606.
T. A. El-Sayed, et al., Influence of Rice, Wheat Straw Ash & Rice Husk Ash on the Properties of Concrete Mixes. Jokull Journal. 67, 5( 2017) 103-119.
N.M. Khalil, E.M. Hassan, M.M.E. Shakdofa, M. Farahat, Beneficiation of the huge waste quantities of barley and rice husks as well as coal fly ashes as additives for Portland cement, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 20 (2014) 2998–3008.
M. Ahiduzzaman, Rice husk energy technologies in Bangladesh, (2007).
E.C. Beagle, Rice-husk: conversion to energy, FAO, 1978.
S. Rukzon, P. Chindaprasirt, Mathematical model of strength and porosity of ternary blend Portland rice husk ash and fly ash cement mortar, Comput. Concr. 5 (2008) 75.
S. Muthukrishnan, S. Gupta, H.W. Kua, Application of rice husk biochar and thermally treated low silica rice husk ash to improve physical properties of cement mortar, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 104 (2019) 102376.
Q. Yu, K. Sawayama, S. Sugita, M. Shoya, Y. Isojima, The reaction between rice husk ash and Ca (OH) 2 solution and the nature of its product, Cem. Concr. Res. 29 (1999) 37–43.
G. Li, M. Li, X. Zhang, P. Cao, H. Jiang, J. Luo, T. Jiang, Hydrothermal synthesis of zeolites-calcium silicate hydrate composite from coal fly ash with co-activation of Ca (OH) 2-NaOH for aqueous heavy metals removal, Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 32 (2022) 563–573.
F.A.W. Chik, R.P. Jaya, B.H.A. Bakar, M.A.M. Johari, School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia Engineering Campus, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Pulau Pinang, MALAYSIA Tel: 04-5996298, Fax: 04-5941009 E-mail: cebad@ eng. usm. my, Int. J. Appl. 1 (2011).
التنزيلات
منشور
إصدار
القسم
كيفية الاقتباس
