تأثير الرش الورقي بتراكيز مختلفة من حمض الهيوميك علي النمو الخضري للطماطم (Lycopersicon esculantum)
الملخص
أجريت تجربة حقلية في مزرعة كلية الزراعة جامعة عمر المختار خلال الموسم الزراعي لصيف 2022 وذلك لدراسة تأثير تراكيز مختلفة بالرش بحمض الهيوميك علي النمو الخضري للطماطم الصنف "منى" ، وكانت المعاملات هي: الرش بالماء فقط (شاهد)، الرش بتركيز1% ، الرش بتركيز 2% (و كان الرش بعد 3 أسابيع من الزراعة لجميع المعاملات). تمت الزراعة في 8 اغسطس في موسم النمو، و كان عمر الشتلات 45 يوم. صممت التجربة بالقطاعات الكاملة العشوائية بثلاث مكرارات. وكانت الصفات الخضرية المدروسة هي إرتفاع النبات، عدد الأوراق، عدد الأفرع الزهرية، المساحة الورقية، و تركيزالكلورفيل، الوزن الطازج، الوزن الجاف. أظهرت النتائج أن الرش بتركيز 2% بعد ثلاث أسابيع من الزراعة سجل أعلى القيم لجميع الصفات الخضرية المدروسة، يليها الرش بتركيز 1% بعد ثلاث أسابيع من الزراعة مقارنة بمعاملة الشاهد التي سجلت أقل القيم لصفات النمو الخضري.
الكلمات المفتاحية:
التسميد العضوي
حمض الهيوميك (HA)
النمو الخضري
كيفية الاقتباس
السنوسي سليمان عمر مسعود, فاطمة عقوب حسين محمد, & فيروز علي أبوبكر أبوعجيلة. (2023). تأثير الرش الورقي بتراكيز مختلفة من حمض الهيوميك علي النمو الخضري للطماطم (Lycopersicon esculantum). مجلة جامعة بني وليد للعلوم الإنسانية والتطبيقية, 8(5), 441-449. https://doi.org/10.58916/jhas.v8i5.97
إصدار
القسم
Article
المراجع
1.
Abdel-Mawgoud, A.M.R., N.H. El-Greadly, Y.I. Helmy and S.M. Singer (2007). Responses of tomato plants to different rates of humic-based fertilizer and NPK fertilization. J.Appli. Sci. Res., 3(2): 169-174.
2.
Abo dahe, Y.M. (1991) Plant nutrition . University of Baghdad, Ministry
3.
Asri, F.O. and E. Demirtas (2015). Changes in fruits yield, quality and nutrient concentrations in response to soil humic acid applications in processing tomato. Bulgarian J. Agric. Sci., 21(3): 585- 591.
4.
Atiyeh, R.M., S. Lee, C.A. Edwards, N.Q. Arancon and J.D. Metzger (2002). The influence of humic acids derived from earthworm-processed organic wastes on plant growth. Bioresource Tech., 84(1): 7-14.
5.
Bhatt, P. and V. K. Singh (2022). Effect of humic acid on soil properties and crop production– A review. Ind. J. Agric. Sci., 92(12): 1423–1430.
6.
Black, C. A. (ed.) 1965; Method of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties, American Society of Agronomy, Inc, Publisher,
7.
David, P.P., P.V. Nelson and D.C. Sanders (1994). A humic acid improves growth of tomato seedling in solution culture. J. Plant Nutri., 17: 173-184
8.
Dursun, A., Guvenc, I. And Turan, M., 2013. Effects of different levels of humic acid on seedling growth and macro and micronutrient contents of tomato and eggplant. Acta Agrobotanica, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 81-88.
9.
Ebrahim, A., K.M. Mohammad, M. Maral, R. Hamid and A. Bozorgi, (2012). Effects of bio, mineral nitrogen fertilizer management, under humic acid foliar spraying on fruits yield and several traits of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Afri. J. Agric. Res., 7(7): 1104-1109.
10.
Eki̇nci̇, M., A. Esri̇Ngü, A. Dursun, E. Yildirim, M. Turan, M.R. Karaman and T. Arjumend (2015).Growth, yield, and calcium and boron uptake of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) as affected by calcium and boron humate application in greenhouse conditions. Turkish J. Agric. Fore., 39: 613-632.
11.
Food and Agriculture Organization Of The United Nations – FAO, (2016). FAOSTAT [online]. Rome: Crop Production, Statistics Division. Available from: http:// www.faostat.fao.org
12.
Gao, F., H. Li, X. Mu, H. Gao, Y. Zhang, R. Li, K. Cao and L. Ye (2023). Effects of organic fertilizer application on tomato yield and quality: A Meta-Analysis. Appl. Sci., 13: 2184.
13.
Garcia, M.C.V., F.S. Estrella, M.J. lopez and Moreno (2008). Influence of compost amendment on soil biological properties and plant dynamic soil. Dynamic plant. Special issue Compost (Guest Editor Xiying Hao). 1(1):1-9.
14.
Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A. (1984) Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research—Hand Book. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
15.
Hill publishing company limited, New Delhi.
16.
Kazemi, M. (2013).Vegetative and reproductive growth of tomato plants affected by calcium and humic acid. Bull. Environ, Pharma. Life Sci., 2(11): 24-29.
17.
Khaled, H. and H. Fawy (2011). Effect of different levels of humic acids on the nutrient content, plant growth and soil properties under conditions of salinity. Soil and Water Res., 6(1): 21-29.
18.
Mirdad, Z.M. (2016). Effect of N fertigation rates and humic acid on the productivity of crisphead lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) grown in sandy soil. J. Agric. Sci., 8(8): 149.
19.
Moraditochaee, M. (2012). Effects of humic acid foliar spraying and nitrogen fertilizer management on yield of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Iran. ARPN J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 7: 289–293.
20.
Nardi, M.R., P. Diego, R. Fabiano and A. Muscolo (1999 ) . Biological Activit of humic substances extracted from soils under different vegetation cover Commun.Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 30 (5&6): 621-634.
21.
Nardi, S.; D. Pizzeghello; A. Muscolo and A.Vianello (2002). Physiological effects of humic substances on higher plants. Soil
22.
Nour, V., I. Trandafir and M.E. Ionica (2013). Antioxidant compounds, mineral content and antioxidant activity of several tomato cultivars grown in Southwestern Romania. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 41(1): 136-142.
23.
of Higher Education and Scientific Research
24.
Olaniyi, J.O and A.T. Ajibola (2008). The effects of inorganic and organic fertilizers application on the growth, fruit yield and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon lycopersicum). Journal of Applied Biosciences, 8(1): 236-242.
25.
Olaniyi, J.O. (2006). Influence of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers on seed yield and quality of ‘Egusi’ Melon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb) Mansf.) in Ogbomoso south Western Nigeria. Ph. D Thesis U.I., Ibadan, Nigeria. pp. 210.
26.
Pettit, R.E. (2004). Organic matter, humus, humate, humic acid, fulvic acid and humin: their importance in soil fertility and plant health. CTI Research, 15 p.
27.
Phelps, B. (2000). Humic Acid Structure and Properties. Phelps Teknowledge. 29/12/1424. http://www.pheplesteck.com /.
28.
Radzevičius, A., P. Viškelis, J. Viškelis, R. Bobinaitė, R. Karklelienė and D. Juškevičienė (2013). Tomato fruits quality of different cultivars growth in Lithuania. Int. J. Agric. Biosys. Eng., 7(7): 381-384.
29.
Ranganna, S. (1977) Manual of analysis of fruit and vegetable products
30.
Richardson, K.V.A. (2012). The effects of pruning versus non-pruning on quality and yield of staked fresh-market tomatoes. Gladstone Road Agricultural Centre Crop Research Report No., 10:1-10.
31.
Salehi, B., R. Sharifi-Rad, F. Sharopov, J. Namiesnik, A. Roointan, M. Kamle, P. Kumar, N. Martins and J. Sharifi-Rad (2019). Beneficial effects and potential risks of tomato consumption for human health: An overview. Nutri., 62: 201–208.
32.
SAS institute, (2008). The SAS System for Windows, release 9.2. Cary NC: SAS institute
33.
Tan, K.H. (2003). Humic Matter in Soil and the Environ-ment. Principles and Controversies. Marcel Dekker, Inc., NY, 408 p.
34.
Ulukan, H. (2008). Effect of soil applied humic acid at different sowing times on some yield components in wheat (Triticum spp.) hybrids Int. J. Bot., 4(2): 164-175.
35.
Unlu, H.O., H. Unlu, Y. Karakurt and H. Padem (2011). Changes in fruit yield and quality in response to foliar and soil humic acid application in cucumber. Scientific Res. Essays, 6: 2800–2803.
36.
Yuan, J.M., R.K. Ross, Y.T. Gao, Y.H. Qu, X.D. Chu and M.C. Yu (2004). Prediagnostic levels of serum micronutrients in relation to risk of gastric cancer in Shanghai, China. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 13: 1772–1780
