A comparative study on soil stabilisation with calcium and magnesium-based binders.
Abstract
Abstract: Soil stabilisation using cementitious materials is a promising technique for improving the mechanical characteristics and suppressing the swelling of expansive and sulfate soil. This study compares the viability of two calcium-based stabilisers (Portland cement-C and lime-L) and one MgO-based stabiliser (magnesium oxide-M) in soil stabilisation. A set of specimens produced by use of two soil materials (pure kaolin soil and artificially gypsum-dosed kaolin) at a constant stabiliser content of 10 wt%, were examined in terms of the unconfined compressive strength (UCS), swelling and derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) analysis. Accordingly, the results revealed that Portland cement (10%C) experienced a superior UCS of 1830 and expansion of 0.44% in the absence of sulfate, whereas magnesium oxide (10%M) outperformed both Portland cement and lime in the suppression of swelling of the artificial sulfate soil, where it induced an expansion magnitude of 1%, relative to that of 15% and 24% for 10%C and 10%L, respectively. However, the 10%M yielded a lower UCS (927 ) relative to that of 2030 for 10%C and 1995 for 10%L in the presence of sulfate. The superiority of 10%C in the absence of sulfate is due to its higher and ions, which provide the needed oxides for the nucleation of the hydrates that interlock the system. As for the dominance of 10%M in the suppression of expansion of sulfate kaolin, it can be assigned to the restriction of the nucleation and growth of ettringite crystals owing to the unavailability of calcium ions.
Keywords:
Ettringite
Portland cement
lime
magnesium oxide
, linear expansion
swelling
How to Cite
M. Ebailila, J. Kinuthia, J. Oti, & A. Muhmed. (2023). A comparative study on soil stabilisation with calcium and magnesium-based binders. Bani Waleed University Journal of Humanities and Applied Sciences, 8(3), 324-336. https://doi.org/10.58916/jhas.v8i3.166
Issue
Section
Articles
References
1.
Al-Atroush, M.E., and Sebaey, T.A., (2021), Stabilization of expansive soil using hydrophobic polyurethane foam: A review., Transportation Geotechnics., 27, 100494. DOI: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100494.
2.
Ikeagwuani, C.C., and Nwonu, D.C., (2019), Emerging trends in expansive soil stabilisation: A review., Journal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering., 11(2), 423-440. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.08.013.
3.
Kalkan, E., (2011), Impact of wetting–drying cycles on swelling behavior of clayey soils modified by silica fume., Applied clay science., 52(4), 345-352. DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2011.03.014.
4.
Jha, A.K., and Sivapullaiah, P.V., (2016), Volume change behavior of lime treated gypseous soil—influence of mineralogy and microstructure., Applied Clay Science., 119, pp.202-212. DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2015.09.017.
5.
Cheshomi, A., Eshaghi, A., and Hassanpour, J., (2017), Effect of lime and fly ash on swelling percentage and Atterberg limits of sulfate-bearing clay., Applied Clay Science., 135, 190-198. DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2016.09.019.
6.
Ebailila, M., Kinuthia, J., and Oti, J., (2022), Suppression of Sulfate-Induced Expansion with Lime–Silica Fume Blends., Materials., 15(8), 2821. DOI: 10.3390/ma15082821.
7.
Seco, A., Miqueleiz, L., Prieto, E., Marcelino, S., García, B., and Urmeneta, P., (2017), Sulfate soils stabilization with magnesium-based binders., Applied Clay Science., 135, 457-464. DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2016.10.033.
8.
M. Ebailila, Sulfate soil stabilisation with silica fume-based binders, Doctoral Thesis, University of South Wales, England, UK, 2022.
9.
Yi, Y., Liska, M., and Al-Tabbaa, A., (2014), Properties of two model soils stabilized with different blends and contents of GGBS, MgO, lime, and PC., Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering., 26(2), 267-274. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000806.
10.
Jin, F., and Al-Tabbaa, A., (2014), Evaluation of novel reactive MgO activated slag binder for the immobilisation of lead and zinc., Chemosphere., 117, 285-294. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.07.027.
11.
Li, W., Ni, P., and Yi, Y., (2019), Comparison of reactive magnesia, quick lime, and ordinary Portland cement for stabilization/solidification of heavy metal-contaminated soils., Science of the Total Environment., 671, 741-753. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.270.
12.
Yi, Y., Zheng, X., Liu, S. and Al-Tabbaa, A., (2015), Comparison of reactive magnesia-and carbide slag-activated ground granulated blastfurnace slag and Portland cement for stabilisation of a natural soil., Applied Clay Science., 111, 21-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2015.03.023.
13.
Liska, M., and Al-Tabbaa, A., (2009), November. Ultra-green construction: reactive magnesia masonry products., In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Waste and Resource Management., 162, 185-196. DOI: 10.1680/warm.2009.162.4.185.
14.
Ebailila, M., Kinuthia, J., Oti, J., and Al-Waked, Q., (2022), Sulfate soil stabilisation with binary blends of lime–silica fume and lime–ground granulated blast furnace slag., Transportation Geotechnics., 37, 100888. DOI: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100888.
15.
Seco, A., Ramírez, F., Miqueleiz, L., and García, B., (2011), Stabilization of expansive soils for use in construction., Applied Clay Science., 51(3), 348-352. DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2010.12.027.
16.
Li, W., Yi, Y., and Puppala, A.J., (2020), Suppressing ettringite-induced swelling of gypseous soil by using magnesia-activated ground granulated blast-furnace slag., Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering., 146(7), 06020008. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0002292.
17.
Yi, Y., Gu, L., Liu, S., and Jin, F., (2016), Magnesia reactivity on activating efficacy for ground granulated blastfurnace slag for soft clay stabilisation. Applied Clay Science., 126, 57-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2016.02.033.
18.
Yi, Y., Li, C., Liu, S., and Al-Tabbaa, A., (2014), Resistance of MgO–GGBS and CS–GGBS stabilised marine soft clays to sodium sulfate attack., Géotechnique., 64(8), 673-679. DOI: 10.1680/geot.14.t.012.
19.
Yi, Y., Liska, M., Unluer, C., and Al-Tabbaa, A., (2013), Carbonating magnesia for soil stabilization., Canadian Geotechnical Journal., 50(8), 899-905. DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2012-0364.
20.
Yi, Y., Liska, M., Jin, F., and Al-tabbaa, A., (2016), Mechanism of reactive magnesia-GGBS soil stabilisation., Canadian Geotechnical Journal., 55, 773–782. DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2015-0183.
21.
Yi, Y., Gu, L., and Liu, S., (2015), Microstructural and mechanical properties of marine soft clay stabilized by lime-activated ground granulated blastfurnace slag., Applied Clay Science., 103, 71-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2014.11.005.
22.
Yi, Y., Liska, M., and Al-Tabbaa, A., (2012) Initial investigation into the use of GGBS-MgO in soil stabilisation., In Grouting and Deep Mixing 2012., 444-453.
23.
Goodarzi, A.R., and Movahedrad, M., (2017), Stabilization/solidification of zinc-contaminated kaolin clay using ground granulated blast-furnace slag and different types of activators., Applied Geochemistry., 81, 155-165. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2017.04.014.
24.
Gu, K., Jin, F., Al-Tabbaa, A., Shi, B., Liu, C., and Gao, L., (2015), Incorporation of reactive magnesia and quicklime in sustainable binders for soil stabilisation., Engineering Geology., 195, 53-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.05.025.
25.
BS EN 197-1:2011, Cement — Part 1: Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements, BSI Standards Limited, London, UK, 2011. https://doi.org/10.3403/30205527.
26.
Beetham, P., Dijkstra, T., Dixon, N., Fleming, P., Hutchison, R., and Bateman, J., (2015), Lime stabilisation for earthworks: a UK perspective., Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Ground Improvement., 168(2), 81-95. DOI: 10.1680/grim.13.00030.
27.
Boardman, D.I., Glendinning, S., and Rogers, C.D.F., (2001), Development of stabilisation and solidification in lime–clay mixes., Geotechnique., 51(6), 533-543. DOI: 10.1680/geot.2001.51.6.533.
28.
Obuzor, G.N., Kinuthia, J.M., and Robinson, R.B., (2011), Enhancing the durability of flooded low-capacity soils by utilizing lime-activated ground granulated blastfurnace slag (GGBS)., Engineering Geology., 123(3), 179-186. DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.07.009.
29.
Afrin, H., (2017), A review on different types soil stabilization techniques., International Journal of Transportation Engineering and Technology., 3(2), 19-24. DOI: 10.11648/j.ijtet.20170302.12.
30.
Ebailila, M., Kinuthia, J., and Oti, J., (2022), Role of Gypsum Content on the Long-Term Performance of Lime-Stabilised Soil., Materials., 15(15), 5099. DOI: 10.3390/ma15155099.
31.
BS EN ISO 17892-7: 2018, Geotechnical investigation and testing-Laboratory testing of soil — Part 7: Unconfined compression test, BSI Standards Limited, London, UK, 2018.
32.
BS EN 13286-49: 2004, Unbound and hydraulically bound mixtures — Part 49: Accelerated swelling test for soil treated by lime and/or hydraulic binder, BSI Standards Limited, London, UK, 2004.
33.
Obuzor, G.N., Kinuthia, J.M., and Robinson, R.B., (2011), Utilisation of lime activated GGBS to reduce the deleterious effect of flooding on stabilised road structural materials: A laboratory simulation., Engineering geology., 122(3-4), 334-338. DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.06.010.
34.
Oti, J.E., Kinuthia, J.M., and Robinson, R.B., (2014), The development of unfired clay building material using Brick Dust Waste and Mercia mudstone clay., Applied clay science., 102, 148-154. DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2014.09.031.
35.
Kinuthia, J.M., and Nidzam, R.M., (2011), Towards zero industrial waste: Utilisation of brick dust waste in sustainable construction., Waste Management., 31(8), 1867-1878. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.020.
36.
Behnood, A., (2018), Soil and clay stabilization with calcium-and non-calcium-based additives: A state-of-the-art review of challenges, approaches and techniques., Transportation Geotechnics., 17, 14-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2018.08.002.
37.
Al-Mukhtar, M., Lasledj, A., and Alcover, J.F., (2014), Lime consumption of different clayey soils., Applied Clay Science., 95, 133-145. DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2014.03.024.
38.
Sharma, L.K., Sirdesai, N.N., Sharma, K.M., and Singh, T.N., (2018), Experimental study to examine the independent roles of lime and cement on the stabilization of a mountain soil: A comparative study., Applied Clay Science., 152, 183-195. DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2017.11.012.
39.
Degirmenci, N., Okucu, A., and Turabi, A., (2007), Application of phosphogypsum in soil stabilization., Building and environment., 42(9), 3393-3398. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.08.010.
40.
Konan, K.L., Peyratout, C., Smith, A., Bonnet, J.P., Rossignol, S., and Oyetola, S., (2009), Comparison of surface properties between kaolin and metakaolin in concentrated lime solutions., Journal of colloid and interface science., 339(1), 103-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.07.019.
41.
Choobbasti, A.J., and Kutanaei, S.S., (2017), Microstructure characteristics of cement-stabilized sandy soil using nanosilica., Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering., 9(5), 981-988. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.03.015.
42.
Puppala, A.J., Talluri, N., and Chittoori, B.C., (2014), Calcium-based stabiliser treatment of sulfate-bearing soils., Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Ground Improvement., 167(3), 162-172. DOI: 10.1680/grim.13.00008.
43.
Jha, A.K., and Sivapullaiah, P.V., (2014), Role of gypsum on microstructure and strength of soil., Environmental Geotechnics., 3(2), 78-89. DOI: 10.1680/envgeo.13.00084.
44.
Aldaood, A., Bouasker, M. and Al-Mukhtar, M., (2016), Effect of water during freeze–thaw cycles on the performance and durability of lime-treated gypseous soil., Cold Regions Science and Technology., 123, 155-163. DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2015.12.008.
45.
Aldaood, A., Bouasker, M., and Al-Mukhtar, M., (2021), Mechanical behavior of gypseous soil treated with lime., Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 39, 719-733. DOI: 10.1007/s10706-020-01517-w.
46.
Aldaood, A., Bouasker, M., and Al-Mukhtar, M., (2014), Free swell potential of lime-treated gypseous soil., Applied Clay Science., 102, 93-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2014.10.015.
47.
Aldaood, A., Bouasker, M., and Al-Mukhtar, M., (2014), Geotechnical properties of lime-treated gypseous soils., Applied Clay Science., 88, 39-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2013.12.015.
48.
Yi, Y., Zheng, X., Liu, S., and Al-Tabbaa, A., (2015), Comparison of reactive magnesia-and carbide slag-activated ground granulated blastfurnace slag and Portland cement for stabilisation of a natural soil., Applied Clay Science., 111, 21-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2015.03.023.
49.
Hossain, K.M.A., Lachemi, M., and Easa, S., (2007), Stabilized soils for construction applications incorporating natural resources of Papua New Guinea., Resources, Conservation and Recycling., 51(4), 711-731. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.12.003.
